Peer Review as Intellectual Accompaniment
Emergent Conversation 16 Edited by Čarna Brković and Jennifer Curtis Imagine a person writing a peer review. Perhaps you will…
All posts by Jennifer Curtis
Introduction: “Thinking With” When Peer Reviewing
By Čarna Brković Emergent Conversation 16 This essay is part of the series PoLAR Online Emergent Conversation on Peer Review…
A Book Publisher’s View on Peer Review
By Fred Appel Emergent Conversation 16 This essay is part of the series PoLAR Online Emergent Conversation on Peer Review…
Shifting Parameters, Adjusted Skills: Peer Reviewing When Funding Is at Stake
By Regina F. Bendix Emergent Conversation 16 This essay is part of the series PoLAR Online Emergent Conversation on Peer…
From ArXiv to Bakhtin, Bringing Dialogue to Peer Review
By Mario Biagioli Emergent Conversation 16 This essay is part of the series PoLAR Online Emergent Conversation on Peer Review…
Disjointed Dialogues: The Perverse Practices of Peer Reviewing
By John Clarke Emergent Conversation 16 This essay is part of the series PoLAR Online Emergent Conversation on Peer Review…
Dispirited Away: The Peer Review Process
By Dada Docot Emergent Conversation 16 This essay is part of the series PoLAR Online Emergent Conversation on Peer Review…
Peer Review and The Production of Sanctimony: A Denunciation
By Elizabeth Cullen Dunn Emergent Conversation 16 This essay is part of the series PoLAR Online Emergent Conversation on Peer…
For Accountability
By Saida Hodžić Emergent Conversation 16 This essay is part of the series PoLAR Online Emergent Conversation on Peer Review…
Reviewer 2 Has Raised Concerns: Peer Review and Editing in the Academy
By Dolly Kikon Emergent Conversation 16 This essay is part of the series PoLAR Online Emergent Conversation on Peer Review…
PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 