India’s Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA)

Protesters hold placards at a demonstration against Indias new citizenship law in Mumbai on December 19, 2019. – Indians defied bans on assembly on December 19 in cities nationwide as anger swells against a citizenship law seen as discriminatory against Muslims, following days of protests, clashes and riots that have left six dead. Photo by PUNIT PARANJPE/AFP via Getty Images.

This PoLAR Online series, India’s Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), is edited by Syantani Chatterjee and Natasha Raheja.

The controversial Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) was signed into law by the Hindu nationalist BJP-led Government of India on December 12, 2019 amid nationwide protests opposing the act. The CAA, the sixth amendment to the 1955 Citizenship Act, expedites Indian citizenship for Hindus and other non-Muslim minorities (Parsi, Sikh, Jain, Christian, and Buddhist) from Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Pakistan. Hailing these minorities from the neighboring Muslim-majority countries as persecuted religious minorities, the act enables access to Indian citizenship on religious grounds. While the bill passed both houses of the Parliament with a clear majority, protests against the CAA had begun well before this bill was passed. Neither the CAA nor its opposition can be seen in isolation. Local and Indigenous forms of resistance have had long roots in Kashmir and the Northeast in the face of sustained Indian occupation, which intensified with the revocation of Article 370 and the administration of the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in Assam. The sustained #NoCAA protests are part of a complex movement soldering different sections of the Indian civil society into a movement of resistance in the face of a seemingly unfazed governmental crackdown, police brutality against students, and state-sanctioned, anti-Muslim violence.

In this series, we emphasize disjuncture to collectively ask how citizenship persists as both an ideal of formal equality as well as a mechanism for the elaboration of social inequity. Although the concept of citizenship is premised on liberal ideals of enfranchisement, the rise of xenophobic nationalisms globally has revealed the very notion of citizenship to be an exclusionary category of belonging. Scholars have thus theorized citizenship as inherent with risk and fault lines (Petryna and Follis 2015), hinging on precarious claims to relative belonging (Geschiere et al 2006). In the context of India, contributors examine both the contradictions in the theoretical underpinnings of citizenship that set up binaries of citizen/non-citizen and insider/outsider, as well as the proliferation of documentary regimes that try to identify who is NOT a citizen. In conversation with scholarship that questions universal conceptualizations of citizenship which foreground the individual as the locus of rights and recognition (Chatterjee 2004), essays engage anthropological approaches to understanding how people struggle for legal recognition and social belonging as members of larger collectivities (Jayal 2013). If citizenship is a set of practices that shape and define membership in a given political community (Lazar 2013), the  series asks, what practices and modes of association are taken up by people who are excluded from recognition?

India’s Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA): Citizenship and Belonging in India

Syantani Chatterjee and Natasha Raheja

 

Unwelcome Guests and Hostages: Minority Claims on the State

Ghazal Asif and Natasha Raheja

 

The Darjeeling plains: Citizenship as Minority Disenfranchisement in a Border District

Abhishek Bhattacharyya

 

The Usual Suspects

Syantani Chatterjee

 

Collective Willfulness: Refashioning Empowered Girlhood

Karishma Desai  

 

Between Faith and Panic

Sahana Ghosh

 

CAA and NRC Stoke the Wrong Problems in Meghalaya

Nafis Hasan

 

Hauntings of a Deadname: Proof, Ephemera, and Queer/Trans Citizenship

Brian A. Horton

 

The New Visibility and Grotesque Impunity of Communalist Police Violence in #NoCAA and COVID India

Beatrice Jauregui

 

Frames of Solidarity: Finding Kashmir in Anti-CAA Protests

Mir Fatimah Kanth 

 

Mizo Indigenous Resistance Against CAA

Mariangela Mihai

 

Protesting in Ahmedabad: Between Resistance and Restrictions

Maya Ratnam, Sarthak Bagchi, Mary Ann Chacko

 

Borderland Citizenship

Sarbani Sharma and Aditi Saraf

 

A State of Fear, Confusion and Hope: CAA and Bengali Dalit Refugees in India

Praskanva Sinharay

 

The Anti-Dalit, Anti-Adivasi Features of the 2020 Indian Citizenship Amendment Act

Suraj Yengde

 

 

 

 

About Jennifer Curtis

Jennifer Curtis is an Honorary Fellow in Social Anthropology at the University of Edinburgh: http://www.sps.ed.ac.uk/staff/social_anthropology/curtis_jennifer.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s